I-140在4月1号后用新表格

一边这么 whining, 一边又不愿意交 589 是吧 :troll:

1 个赞

@小厨娘

rnm退钱!

:troll:

欢迎泥潭网友交589薅羊毛,而且589了更能腾出配额给泥潭家人,感动中国好吧。 :yaoming:

3 个赞

请厨老师开贴指导潭友制造案情 :troll:

明姨待访。只要反对中共,尽管交589。

2 个赞

rt,签约wg的朋友说wg的理解是4/1开始self- petitioner(niw & eb1a)要按照大型雇主交asylum fee,600刀

简直是明抢呀。不过为啥self-petitioner要按照大雇主交钱呢?

我猜 如果 self petitioner 如果只交300 的话, 那大型雇主可以 是不是都可以给员工都办成self petitioner 了。
不然我也不知道还有什么其他原因了。

我怎么觉得wg有点乱解读,最好还是等过一两个月的实际dp

In addition, the rule includes a new Asylum Program Fee of $600 that employers pay if they file either Form I-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker, Form I-129CW, Petition for a CNMI-Only Nonimmigrant Transitional Worker, or Form I-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Workers. The fee will cover some of the costs associated with asylum processing, which does not include its own fee. This fee increase for employer petitioners mitigates the size of the fee increases for individual filers.

原话是这样的

合法 :x:
非法 :white_check_mark:

hhh。uscis官宣了,这解释着实看不懂呀…在读学生不能按employer是non-profit exempt这600刀?

Q. Do self-petitioners also pay the Asylum Program Fee, and, if so, do they pay the full amount of $600?

A. Self-petitioners filing Form I-129 or Form I-140 must pay the Asylum Program Fee. However, they are eligible for the reduced Asylum Program Fee of $300 if they are small employers with 25 or fewer full-time equivalent (FTE) employees in the United States, or if the self-petitioner is an employee. If an employee is effectively self-filing as an employer for an entity of which they are the sole owner, we would base any reduced fee on the nonprofit status of that employer and on the number of FTE employees that employer has in the United States and among its subsidiaries and affiliates.

2 个赞

看起来是可以半价