父中国国籍美国绿卡母美国公民,小孩生在哪是最佳羊毛选项?

那么“是否有外国国籍”这一项,如果选了“是”,大使馆还会给他换发护照吗?

不会。合法的双重国籍(“国际冲突”)是:

外国国籍 否
外国护照 是
需说明情况:出生在美国

能报一下哪年、国内哪个省/城市换的吗?大概范围就好。如果是小城市也可以帮大家排个雷。因为我没听说大城市要这么操作的。

只有一种情况国内国外换护照都神经病,就是你出生地是国外。哪怕是绝对血统主义国家(例如出生在沙特)。

1 个赞

2022年,疫情后期,北方某个200万人口的资源型小城市

上面那句“没有外国国籍,否则承担法律责任”的话,是事先打印好的,只需要你签字。

不过感觉就是走个形式,如果真想查,就算你不签也会查你。如果不想查,就算签了也不会去查你。我感觉,这张声明书其实就是有朝一日发现你双持的时候,注销你的护照和户口的理由,用来堵你的嘴,让你哑口无言用的

1 个赞

This post is mostly about American law, so I won’t try to write in Chinese for it.

Given the current geopolitical difficulties–which will only get worse–I believe it’s risky for Chinese-Americans to give birth outside of the United States (unless they are certain that they and their children will NOT want to stay in the US).

The reason is that jus soli conveyance of US citizenship is part of the US constitution, and is therefore difficult to change or challenge. No matter how bad anti-China hysteria gets in the US, children born in the US will have their US citizenship secure. See U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark.

However, jus sanguinis conveyance of US citizenship is by regular legislation (Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952), and theoretically can be overturned – potentially even after the fact – by another piece of legislation.

It is entirely possible for a Republican congress under a Republican president to pass a new law that would strip away US citizenship derived from jus sanguinis if the person in question was born in mainland China or Hong Kong and if at least 1 parent was also born in mainland China or Hong Kong. There’s a non-zero chance that such a law, even retroactive, would survive Supreme Court review, because there’s no constitutional issue and a sufficiently ideological Supreme Court will be able to find enough reasons to uphold that law if it really wanted too. (Although I suppose reasonable minds may differ on this. I’m a firm believer in legal realism.)

civil war hong kong

So there’s a life-long potential risk of losing US citizenship if born outside of the US. Whereas the benefit of having a HK SAR passport is more nebulous UNLESS YOU ARE ALREADY SET ON GOING BACK TO CHINA W YOUR KID – if things got so bad in the US that your entire family have to run back to China, China will almost certainly accept ethnic Chinese refugees regardless of if they hold a Chinese travel document. Just make sure you have valid 10 year Chinese visas for your children. You can improve things even further by having one spouse not naturalize, so if you ever have to run, it’ll be one parent with a Chinese passport taking the rest of the family back to China.

4 个赞

是的

I agree to your opinion.

第十四修正案只提到了出生和归化来的公民,所以如果真的走了归化程序,基本上撤销也是违宪的。最可怕的就是血统来的公民(《海外出生领事报告》或者INA 320)——没有宪法保障。

but I shall call you a cultral chauvinist.

1 个赞

真到现有美国公民的国籍都能随意剥夺的那天,美国已经不再是宜居的国家了。真的那么担心不如再弄个欧盟国籍作为后路岂不是更好。

1 个赞

不反对所有内容,除了

这个口子要是能开,那1980s那次大赦得到身份的人是有可能被retroactively剥夺身份?

Even a Republican congress (also, you’re telling me Republicans can win 2/3 of the senate? In this political climate?) won’t pass a law like this- if anything, they’re more concerned about the so called anchor baby than the legitimate children of US citizens born overseas. This will be an inherently unpopular legislation, and I don’t see any good reason to support it even from a redneck perspective. Plus, don’t forget that our dear senator from Texas was actually born in Canada :yaoming:

你要注意安重根假定新政的prerequisite:

这个属人主义国别限定对于绝大多数美国政客民众而言没有任何影响;对于gop甚至很多dem而言是很可以被接受的。当然我是不认为类似的政策能retroactively实施。

那么香港那些在回归前就已经拿到PR的英联邦公民,以及他们在97年之后出生的子女,现在是什么身份?具体来说,是什么国籍?在香港是PR还是TR?

入境条例(第115章)附表1

6.過渡性條文
(1)

任何非中國籍的人,如在1997年7月1日以前是香港永久性居民,則在以下情況下,該人被視為根據第2(d)段成為香港特別行政區永久性居民,及獲豁免遵守第3段的規定 ——

(a)他在緊接1997年7月1日以前已在香港定居;

(b)他在緊接1997年7月1日以前不再在香港定居,但在自1997年7月1日起計的18個月內返回香港定居;或

(c)他在緊接1997年7月1日以前不再在香港定居,但在自1997年7月1日起計的18個月後返回香港定居,而且必須沒有連續36個月或以上不在香港。

(2)
自1997年7月1日起,任何屬中國公民且在緊接1997年7月1日前根據當時有效的本條例屬香港永久性居民的人,只要他仍是中國公民,即屬香港特別行政區永久性居民。

由于HKPR属人主义对非中国籍人士而言,只适用于出生于香港的人,因此他们在97后出生的子女,如出生在HK以外,不是HKPR。如出生在香港,则出生时如父母根据过渡性条文是HKPR,则子女在年满21周岁前是HKPR【基本法24.2(5)】。

由于基本法24.2采取了“是”(is)的口吻,因此在以下极端例子中:

一名澳大利亚男性取得HKPR后在1997/06/30离港,其后他的法国籍夫人以访客身份入境香港产子,而该澳大利亚人没有回港。此时该子女不是HKPR,但如果此后任何时候该澳大利亚人回港激活HKPR,可以一并激活24.2(5)。因为该子女出生时其父亲的HKPR处于未决状态,而不是尚未获得的状态,参照人大对24.2(2)(3)的解释。