佛州法律还能管联邦选举？
一党当政蛮好的，就没什么好吵的
jury unanimity is required not just for the general verdict of guilt but for each element of the crime
法官給的instruction是
judge gave the jury the instructions that they did not have to be unanimous on any single crime. Only that they had to be unanimous that he did commit a crime. There were 3 crimes presented. So 4 could think him guilty of one 4 of another and 4 on the last, and still convict him. 法官給了三個罪名，但是陪審團不需要在具體罪名上一致（可以是4個人在罪名A，4個人罪名B4， 4個人罪名C來達成conviction）但是其實可能12個人都不能在罪名ABC達成一致
3 个赞
那是因为共和党在众议院只有微弱的多数。如果川普真的上台了，绝对会绝地报复，Biden 家族成员会官司缠身的。心照不宣的平衡打破了就成了香蕉
共和国了嗨，明天可能就不做了，洗脚不行
曼德拉回来之后，南非变成什么样了？
拜登儿子流传出来的照片
够不够他上电椅的？
华川粉被卖了还要帮人数钱呢
4 个赞
川普今天被陪审团认定34项罪名全部成立！（今天全程没看见川普老婆和他大女儿一家）我关心明天股市如何表现，有高见的评论区指教一下
https://x.com/CNN/status/1796288607797350592
你来晚了
我在 People v. DJT Jury Instructions 里没有看到 “did not have to be unanimous on any single crime” 的表述，你能 quote 一下 instructions 里的你认为有问题的几句吗？
我觉得川普找德三蒂斯彻夜长谈，把事业托付给他，然后三尺白绫以死明志，这才是悲情分拉满
这样共和党大概说不准也许能选上的吧 
要不要fact check一下再以讹传讹？
8 个赞
为啥不是吵架版？
和发文的用户有关
This is will backfired badly….
你需要理解一下川粉，他们认知不足，难以分辨现实。他们的世界观认为这个国家充满了糟粕，任何针对川普的阴谋和不公平都是合理的存在，只有依靠川普才能打破这些不公。
7 个赞
Ordinarily, falsification of business records, which requires “an intent to defraud,” is a misdemeanor. But it becomes a felony when the defendant’s “intent to defraud” includes “an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.” The prosecution’s theory of “another crime” relies on Section 17-152 of the New York Election Law—a statute so obscure that experts said they had never seen another criminal case based on it. That provision makes it a misdemeanor for “two or more persons” to “conspire to promote or prevent the election of any person to a public office by unlawful means.”
Merchan laid out three possible candidates for “unlawful means” to which prosecutors have alluded. One is debatable, while the other two make little or no sense in the context of Section 17-152. Merchan said the jurors need not settle on any particular theory of “unlawful means,” provided they agree that Trump was trying to aid or conceal a violation of Section 17-152.
上面有人解釋過了，tldr這個felony要成立必須要有個underlying crime to cover，不然就是輕罪，judge instruction表示不需要對這個underlying crime達成一致，就是1-4號陪審員認為trump 是falsifying business record for crime A，5-8號可以覺得trump 是falsifying business record for crime B，9-12號覺得trump 是falsifying business record for crime C，最後這樣也可以conviction
1 个赞
东方红 太阳升 美国出了个特朗普
你觉得你引用的这个文章，和法庭比起来，谁更适合解释法律 
川普这货实际上非常自私, 他很清楚, 共和党随便换个人, 都会赢。就他, 赢不了, 可为了家族利益, 绑架了整个共和党。
6 个赞