官网也卖二手 可能需要保持一定的预备役吧
那个，老哥知道油改电是什么意思吗
非承载的车哪来的油改电这个概念
架不住电免费啊
lightning开110k miles就可以省出来一台F150油车
支持。铁丝拉保险涨涨涨
我都快忘记了这俩来自Obama care
狗日的奥巴驴就一独裁
1 个赞
多特斯拉没啥影响，特斯拉有庞大的海外市场，少7500补贴特斯拉销量不会有太大变化，而且特斯拉还有很多其他业务。特斯拉算“科技公司”，不太算制造企业
看看benz狂甩eq系列就知道bba日子也不好过至少电车系列投资基本打水漂了
歪个楼，泥潭真的不考虑加一个Trump的tag嘛，天天各种信息满天飞，每天无数个虚空计划和虚空拆招，没完没了了
1 个赞
车子的补贴取消了，电还会一直免费嘛 
现在进Toyota股票算不算发财机会？
对 因为这credit 其他车企的ev 才可以卖出去(tesla 有段时间不符合这个credit 要求 因为卖太好了)
建议特朗普把碳积分也取消了 
求仁得仁
3 个赞
据说川普要搞中国特色资本主义了？
希望ACA不会被砍，没有ACA的补贴，我母亲的保险一个月都要$900，前天我和她说到时候ACA补贴如果被砍，你国内养老金只够买医疗保险，作为川粉的她懵了。
3 个赞
好奇，她投票给川吗？是知道了这个影响自己的养老金医保，仍然要投票给他？
还是说在加州，投票给川，因为知道加州会counter不会影响自己的生态？
她不是公民，所以不能投票。其实她都不知道她的保险是ACA。她支持川普完全是因为被阴谋论洗脑，比如“加州学校鼓励孩子变性，孩子可以自己决定变性”。
ACA是联邦政府出钱的，要是政府不给钱了，加州应该没辙了，最多扩大Medi-cal。
2 个赞
好奇，有多少投票是被误导的vote against 自己的利益，有多少人投票是计算verify适合自己的利益
今天刚刚看到一篇文章To Win Back Voters, Democrats Should Let Trump Be Trump by Yasheng Huang - Project Syndicate
谈这个问题：
In other words, a significant portion of the electorate seemingly voted against its own interests. Democrats may attempt to address this disconnect by improving their voter-outreach strategies, but this ignores the underlying problem. Strong opposition mounted by Democratic lawmakers against GOP policies over the past decade has shielded voters from confronting the consequences of their choices.
This is particularly true of voters who are socially conservative yet tend to support progressive economic policies. Although they agree with Democrats on key issues like expanding access to health care, protecting Social Security, and reducing drug prices, they also value conservative principles held by the Republicans. By voting for Republican candidates, these voters effectively get to have their cake and eat it, expressing conservative moral preferences while relying on Democrats to fight for their basic economic security.
然后作者主张：
But Democrats should do exactly the opposite. Instead of blocking President-elect Donald Trump’s “Make America Great Again” (MAGA) agenda, they should let it play out. Doing so just might be the surest way to put on full display the cruelty and recklessness of the MAGA agenda and win back the support of working-class Americans.
By exposing ordinary Americans to the harsh consequences of MAGA policies – the elimination of essential health-care protections, the erosion of the minimum wage, tax cuts for the rich, and the rollback of environmental and workplace-safety regulations – Democrats could underscore Trump’s anti-worker objectives. Without the Affordable Care Act (ACA, also known as Obamacare), which Republicans aim to repeal, working-class voters in red states who have benefited greatly from its insurance mandate may come to realize that the Democratic Party is more aligned with their interests.
mass deportation，关税，废除Obamacare，全招呼上，等到建筑工人农场工人屠宰场工人赶走1/3，Walmart里吃的用的价格翻倍，入门买菜车35k，盖房子修房子排队三年，医保$1500一个月，美国人就知道川普的美丽蓝图长什么样了lol
7 个赞
But, R are really good at deflecting and blaming all things to the other, with or without factual basis.
Friend, we might be targeted as the other.
总结一下就是四个字“加速主义”。我觉得这个主意确实不错，美国选民确实要看看让川普放手做事能搞成什么鬼样子。
2 个赞