入境的时候赶上ord下午一波小高峰，在入境大厅等了半個小時，在第一道门入境边检那边很丝滑，递交了797和护照，问了公司名字，工作做什么的，然后就have a nice day放行了，但是给的蓝条上写了些东西（没印象具体写了啥）
在提取好行李以后，走海关那个收蓝条处被要求走左边的2号门，ord那边一二号门是查行李的通道，我前面一个也被要求走二号门，但是她们直接走了一号门就过行李检查机，我到了二号门门口的时候 cbp问了一句“who sent you there？”然后把我的护照和蓝条拿走了，进去找了一下其他便装同事然后就让我带着行李进了一对一interview中心（当时还感觉一脸懵逼，我怀疑是不是走错了）然后出来一个便装大叔把我领到房间说要对我做一下secondary inspection
开始提问环节，问了个人信息具体工作是做什么的，为什么回国的目的，以及去哪儿了这常规问题。是问了父母是干啥的，是不是党员这些然后扯了一些有的没的，说要对我的行李进行检查，然后翻了两个箱子（根本检查不仔细，就是简单看了看带了啥）然后本以为要结束就放走了，最后拿出来electric inspection那个条子说要检查我的手机。然后就让我在外面等，看了20分钟叫我进来说“so far so good”但还是继续问了几个问题。
Pursuant to CBP’s border search authority explained above, when presenting their effects for inspection, all travelers are obligated to present their electronic devices and the information resident on the device in a condition that allows for the examination of the device and its contents. If the electronic device cannot be inspected because it is protected by a passcode or encryption or other security mechanism, that device may be subject to exclusion, detention, or other appropriate action or disposition. Additionally, the traveler may face longer processing times to allow for CBP to access the contents of the device.
Foreign nationals who are applicants for admission to the United States must establish to the satisfaction of the inspecting CBP officer that they are entitled to enter the United States. Admissibility determinations are made based on the totality of the circumstances. If a foreign national refuses to present their electronic devices and the information resident on the device in a condition that allows for the examination of the device and its contents, CBP may consider the foreign national’s noncompliance and the inability to inspect the device when making admissibility decisions and may take appropriate law enforcement actions. However, CBP’s ability to inspect an electronic device alone does not determine admissibility.
他说就是一个例行检查，没有啥问题。
