码农之后,下一个被AI威胁的白领职业,金融从业者要遭?

东西海岸同时被hit吗?

Artificial intelligence darling Anthropic unveiled a set of new AI agents, and they are aimed directly at Wall Street. Designed to handle a broader mix of financial services tasks, Anthropic says they can draft pitch decks for client meetings, review financial statements and escalate cases for compliance review. The new tools—10 in total—are directed squarely at professionals across banking, insurance, asset management and financial technology.

In February, an automation tool from Anthropic sparked a $285 billion rout in stocks across the software, financial services and asset management sectors as investors raced to dump shares with even the slightest exposure. Tuesday’s reaction wasn’t quite so dramatic, though certainly unpleasant for some.

FactSet Research Systems shares fell as much 8.1% after the announcement while Morningstar erased earlier gains to fall more than 3%. Shares of S&P Global and Moody’s both saw sharp selling pressure as well. Thomson Reuters shares fell as much as 5.1%.

As part of the new offerings, Anthropic said it is enabling its Claude AI model to work better across third-party software like Excel, PowerPoint and Outlook, and integrate data from partners in the financial services industry, such as Dun & Bradstreet and Moody’s.

Also of potential interest to financial industry workers, Anthropic is deepening its ties to Wall Street through a new joint venture with Blackstone, Hellman & Friedman and Goldman Sachs. The venture will work to deploy its software to more businesses. OpenAI has finalized plans for a similar endeavor. —Jordan Parker Erb

:rocket:

加速 :troll:

1 个赞

有何发财机会?

idk man我今天让Claude重构代码时问他“这个条件会是true吗” claude回答“不会,因为在情况a 它是true,情况B还是true,所以这个条件会是true”

:distorted_face:

1 个赞

所以我选择codex

I mean 你让常熟阿诺来写个代码可能还行,整金融真的大丈夫吗

1 个赞

华尔街不早就是代码在交易了么?

所有的脑力劳动被替代只是时间早晚吧

我有时候在想模型越做越大,越来越费电,硬件也越来越贵。最终能不能取代人可能取决于同一件task喊人来做的成本vs自动化的成本。自动化做到90%容易,最后那10%要想实现自动化可能成本极高最终就还是得靠便宜的人工来完成。特斯拉超级工厂就是典型的例子,马斯克最后就说over automation是一个错误决策,反而推高了成本,有些工作还是人来做更便宜。不知道对于AI来说这个平衡点在哪里

2 个赞

累了,来就来吧

我有两个counter argument:

1、LLM能替你坐牢吗?
2、LLM说到底是个概率机器,没有智能,你说这样的东西全面替代脑力劳动我是不信的。

2 个赞

我公司很多非license职位美名其曰是AI其实已经转到印度了,这里的I 是 India :liekai:

就等openai上市了

1 个赞

我们公司很多在波兰,yysy干的挺好的

  1. 总归可以找到人背锅的,model provider,用ai的公司,用ai的人。ai总不能自己插上电源自己跑吧,总归有人execute了ai。不会找不到责任人的
  2. 啥是智能?你和我就有智能吗?我们不也是根据过去的人生经验来推测未来吗,其实本质上也是一种"inference"。
3 个赞

我们显然没有智能啊

Factset bbg这些公司都是卖数据的,软件是副产品,没数据啥都白搭。

金融行业最重要的软件excel在微软手里,希望给点力:enraged_face:

你也说了是波兰,我跟三儿们交流头都大了,不过波兰干得再好也顶不过三儿的便宜但工作质量下降严重

有智能的已经靠半导体财富自由了, 剩下我们没智能的在担心被AI取代 :yaoming:

我觉得写银行业写代码的人可能会受影响,但是做监管的人可能会更多,否则AI搞出来个系统性风险可就傻了逼了。